Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of law case study assignment cartune
Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of law case study assignment cartune
Blog Article
five. Acquired Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel for the complainant further argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led into the recovery of sleeping tablets on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has become created before the Court wherein the sleeping drugs were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected while in the liver although not during the tummy. For this reason, the recovery of mentioned sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Figured out Deputy Prosecutor General together with counsel for that complainant have also argued that during the investigation of the case the petitioner Bhoora led on the recovery of a motorcycle.
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of in the future within the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness from the alleged prevalence along with the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to get the real brothers with the deceased but they didn't respond whatsoever to your confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on so many occasions that extra judicial confession of the accused is actually a weak kind of evidence which can be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is usually relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning existence of some light for the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners alongside one another with a motorcycle at four.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons acquiring their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character click here and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade in the accused hasn't been conducted nonetheless. In the instant case, now the accused tried to choose advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture of your petitioner was greatly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity of the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated photographs. In addition to, the images shown over the media reveal that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity right until he was place up for an identification parade. Making photographs on the accused publically, both by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or program, would create doubt while in the proceedings of the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to ensure that there isn't any probability for that witness to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Supplied the reasons elaborated higher than, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
In this website post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions and the gravity of its punishment.
If a victim is shot at point-blank assortment, it may well still be fair to infer that the accused intended death. However, that isn't always the case.
This guide gives important insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case law, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
13. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is set up as well as employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it is the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the various penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct is not really satisfactory though the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in the structured and lawful fashion. Read more
Please note, For anyone who is seeking a price exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration because of the Court under Article 184 (three), has actually been setting a precedent which allows for much simpler access towards the public to strategy the superior courts along with the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of your laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--